Questions and answers
SNB BNS
 www.snb.ch   Home   Sitemap   Orders   Deutsch   Français   Italiano
 
Search
The world of the National Bank
Questions and answers
Glossary
Some questions and answers on banks


Where and by whom was the first bank set up?
Who owns the banks in Switzerland?
Who is allowed to set up a bank in Switzerland nowadays?
What is the difference in meaning between "note-issuing bank" and "central bank"?
What would happen if everyone suddenly decided at the same time to withdraw their money from the banking system?
Could the economy still operate if there were no banks?
Why does the amount of interest on an account go up and down?
Why are there different interest rates?
Is there the opposite of money creation, i.e. destruction of money?

.
Where and by whom was the first bank set up?
Money changing and lending were part of many ancient cultures. The Middle Ages saw an expansion of trade in Europe and with it the need for professional banking services. Some of the first banks of that time were the banking houses in the trading cities of Italy.

.
Who owns the banks in Switzerland?
Most banks are owned by shareholders. The big banks are owned by private shareholders, while the cantonal banks are wholly or majority-owned by the cantons. But there are also some private banks owned by a few individuals forming a partnership.

.
Who is allowed to set up a bank in Switzerland nowadays?
Anyone who meets the statutory conditions and obtains authorisation from the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA may open a bank in Switzerland. The conditions for authorisation, which are laid down in the Banking Law, are strict, as savers and investors need to be protected. For example, a bank must show that it has a sound organisational structure and the required minimum capital. Also, those entrusted with its administration and management must "enjoy a good reputation and thereby assure the proper conduct of business operations."

.
What is the difference in meaning between "note-issuing bank" and "central bank"?
Both terms refer to the same thing, namely a bank that is responsible for supplying the country with money. The former term highlights the bank's monopoly in the issue of banknotes, while the latter conveys the idea of a central institution that issues money, manages a country's money supply and plays a central role in the payments system.

.
What would happen if everyone suddenly decided at the same time to withdraw their money from the banking system?
The banks would face major difficulties. Although they keep sufficient liquid funds to protect savers, this would not be enough if there were a run on the banks. In such a case, the National Bank and the banks would have to take emergency measures. However, in a sound economy with an efficient banking system such a situation is very unlikely to arise.

.
Could the economy still operate if there were no banks?
Theoretically, an economy without banks is possible. A house could be financed with the help of relations and a company could also borrow from other companies. However, banks have some crucial advantages over private borrowing arrangements. They have specialised knowledge and manage large amounts of savings, so they can respond to the needs of a large number of borrowers. For this reason a modern economy without banks is now virtually inconceivable.

.
Why does the amount of interest on an account go up and down?
Interest is the price paid for the use of borrowed money. It fluctuates according to supply and demand. If the banks receive a lot of money from savers and there is little demand for loans, they reduce their interest rates. But if savings are in short supply and the demand for loans is high, the banks will raise their interest rates.

.
Why are there different interest rates?
The rate of interest can differ, depending for example on the type of borrower. Savers lend their money at a lower rate to a borrower with a high credit rating like the State than to someone who engages in high-risk business. And usually the rate paid on a long-term loan will be higher than that on a short-term loan, because lending for a longer period entails more risk.

.
Is there the opposite of money creation, i.e. destruction of money?
The process whereby money is destroyed can be explained in the same way as money creation. Suppose a saver decides to withdraw his money from his savings book and keep it in cash. But the bank has lent most of it out in the form of a loan and kept back only a small reserve. It therefore needs to call in the loan. Fortunately the loan happens to expire just at that time and the borrower repays it in the form of banknotes. The bank pays the saver his credit balance and deletes the loan from its books. The money supply has thus been reduced by the amount of the loan. In other words, money has been destroyed.


Questions and answers...
... on money
... on banks
... on monetary policy
... on the National Bank